McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Evidence Summary

What is an Evidence Summary?

Key messages from scientific research that's ready to be acted on

Got It, Hide this
  • Rating:

How society perceives aging can reinforce negative self-stereotypes related to age

Previtali F, Keskinen K, Niska M, Nikander P. Ageism in working life: A scoping review on discursive approaches The Gerontologist. 2020.

Review question

      What does qualitative research add to our understanding of ageism in working life?

Background

      There is a growing body of literature interested in the nature of ageism in the context of working life.

      Wide-ranging quantitative reviews have been published on ageism. These reviews reveal that ageism is present in the workforce and that it creates barriers in recruitment, career advancement, training opportunities, retirement decision, and in the relations between managers, or employers, and employees.

      The aim of this review is to highlight the contribution of qualitative studies to ageism research specifically in the context of working life.

How the review was done

      Review authors conducted a detailed search of seven research databases for eligible articles for inclusion.

      Keywords used in the search included variations of the following terms: ageism, discourse, communication, and narrative.

      A total of 851 articles were retrieved from the initial search, of which 39 were included in the review.

      This project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 764632. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

What the researchers found

      The review revealed three main themes: a) experiences of ageism, b) social construction of age and ageist ideologies, and c) strategies to counteract ageism.

      Thirteen studies reported on experiences of ageism, whereby researchers allowed participants to describe their experiences of stereotypical treatment and discrimination because of their age. Research participants often explained ageism with reference to their personal attributes, such as slowing bodies, decreased work ability, increased health problems, and low skills and ability to learn new things. Beyond these negative attributes, research participants also discussed ageism in relation to their overqualification and the expensiveness that comes with experience.

      Conceptualizations and ideologies regarding age are collaboratively constructed in our society, and they become tangible in social interaction. Review authors identified different types of ideologies and social constructions regarding ageism in the working life: aging as a hindering process, the normative construction of the life course, the “othering” of older workers, and the organizational ageist discourses.

      In terms of strategies to counteract ageism, this review included discussions on coping strategies. The main coping resource reported by participants was social support, which was found to increase the sense of membership to the work community and personal value.

Conclusion

      The review showed that workers of all ages adapt to the conceptualization society has adopted regarding aging. These are rooted in a youthfulness ideology and reinforced by a normative life course.

      In working life, individuals are labelled as older or younger when they enter a certain chronological age. This labelling attaches a predefined identity to a single person and thus reinforces negative self-stereotypes related to age.

 



Related Topics


Related Web Resources

DISCLAIMER These summaries are provided for informational purposes only. They are not a substitute for advice from your own health care professional. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the McMaster Optimal Aging Portal (info@mcmasteroptimalaging.org).

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register